Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gay card

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 07:11, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Gay card

Gay card (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Wikipedia is not UrbanDictionary. - ∅ (∅), 12:47, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete. It's been transwikied, which is far too kind for it. --UsaSatsui 15:53, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Couldn't find it on wiktionary, and definitely shouldn't be here. Whilding87 16:28, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Although I have come across this phrase, it means something else around here. Certainly unverifiable, and non-notable. J Milburn 16:38, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete, and I rather doubt Wiktionary wants it either. —Angr 07:43, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep. I can see the idea that this is possibly more appropriate for Wiktionary. However, I note there is a large list of LGBT Terms existing in Wikipedia, so it might just be that there is insufficient information about this term. Please note that I have just added references which (unlike the Google link I originally provided) probably meet Wikipedia's verification requirements. Notatest 05:45, 11 February 2007 (UTC) (original poster) Also, the list of items which allegedly qualifies one for loss of one's gay card is not something which belongs in a dictionary and is, I believe, more suited to an encyclopedia. Notatest 06:10, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
 Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Quarl (talk) 08:19, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. --Quuxplusone 09:02, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. Khukri - 09:54, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
  • The 'references' (appearances) section is larger than the article itself. Weak rewrite using the references as ... well ... references, or delete. -- saberwyn 11:07, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.