Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ganguvarpatti

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep, real town. Kusma (討論) 08:04, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Ganguvarpatti

Small none notable town in India--M8v2 21:24, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

• Strong Keep: It's got a population of 10,569. It is recognized by Census of India. Since when notability criteria applied to towns? This nom fails WP:CSB. - Ganeshk 01:44, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per Ganeshk. --Antorjal 02:00, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
• Strong Keep per Ganeshk. Nobleeagle (Talk) 02:12, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletions. Bakaman _Bakatalk 02:22, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - Many places have less people. This place is notable.Bakaman _Bakatalk 02:22, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
• Strong and Speedy Keep per every one.  Doctor Bruno Talk 02:35, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
• Strong Keep per Ganesh.-- thunderboltz^(Deepu) 02:55, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
• Strong Keep per above -- Lost^(talk) 04:00, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

• Strong keep: 1. It is Verifiable. 2. What does size have to do with being non-notable? If an area is verifiable, and the article has info beyond the one-liner /empty page stage, there is no harm in having pages on such geographic locations. I also note that this town has 10,000+ people, at least 5 times that of small hamlets spread throughout other countries (Albion, Illinois with 1950 or so people is a prime example). --Ragib 04:41, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy keep, nomination couldn't be more fallacious. Punkmorten 07:33, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.