Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gang run printing

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was KEEP. per WP:SNOW; clearly notable, and sources have been added Rodhullandemu (Talk) 13:38, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Gang run printing

Gang run printing (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Looks made up Pla$ticbag (talk) 10:06, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

  • Keep. Definitely not made up. The article needs sources, and it's difficult to find noncommercial ones online. Someone ought to investigate print sources—manuals of printing procedures, specialized glossaries, and the like. One can tell that not much work went into this nomination, the nominator's fifth edit on WP. Deor (talk) 12:20, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep. Plenty of sources available. I've added a couple. ascidian | talk-to-me 13:33, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep. Perfectly valid article about a printing technology. Has been improved by Ascidian, would have been a keeper in any case. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:07, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep. It is a fixed terminus technicus and the only information available in a free enzyclopedia. --Symposiarch (talk) 15:57, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep. This is a well-documented practice in the printing industry. --Eastmain (talk) 17:12, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep - The only thing "made up" here is this nom. Ed Fitzgerald (unfutz) (talk / cont) 19:23, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep - not made up, a Google search for it reveals plenty of results. Lots of sources are available. paranomia (formerly tim.bounceback)a door? 20:50, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep Agree with everyone else Broooooooce (talk) 12:08, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.