Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gamma Delta Pi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. --Sam Blanning^(talk) 19:29, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Gamma Delta Pi

Non-notable sorority. Page was PRODed by me but was removed without explanation by article creator. ...Scott⁵¹¹⁴ 00:03, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

• Delete nn organisation. Beno1000 00:21, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. AmiDaniel (Talk) 02:06, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, but desperately needs clean-up to fix NPOV violations. --Ginkgo100 03:17, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, unless the article can be edited to describe the sorority nationwide, not just the chapter in Ithaca.--Kungfu Adam ^(talk) 03:30, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete sororities are a dime a dozen - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 03:42, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, nn. --Terence Ong 06:06, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, yet another non-notable fraternity/sorority. JIP | Talk 08:08, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete non-notable. --Siva1979^{Talk to me} 16:25, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep or merge. -- JJay 19:16, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, NN --Deville (Talk) 02:35, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep but rewrite. There appear to be [other] Gamma Delta Pis out there, besides the Ithaca chapter. 216.227.122.37 05:43, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, but that Gamma Delta Pi has nothing to with the article written meaning it's probably a bunch of non notable sororities.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Jklin (talk • contribs)

• Delete. I was going to vote keep until I realized that this was a misleadingly-titled article about an indivdual chapter of the sorority rather than an article about the sorority itself. If someone wants to rewrite this as an article about the actual sorority, I wouldn't be opposed to keeping it, but, until then, I support deletion in that articles kept on the grounds that they should be rewritten never seem to actually get rewritten. If someone wants to start an actual article about the sorority itself later, I have no problem with that. As mentioned above, this article is also extremely NPOV. BTW, are there really sororities where members are only known by numbers, rather than their names (as this article asserts)? ergot 13:51, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
• Merge and Delete into Ithaca College article, let normal editors of that article to decide if this group is notable enough. -- ReyBrujo 17:46, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per ergot Melchoir 00:51, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep this is so interesting—Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.51.93.243 (talk • contribs)
• Delete per nom.--Joe Jklin 10:17, 5 May 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.