Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gameheads

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. NawlinWiki 03:56, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Gameheads

Gameheads (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Seems quite spammy and non-notable, but I fear hitting it with a speedy deletion tag will end up in its being listed here anyway. Fee Fi Foe Fum 02:55, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

• Strong Delete Promotional, with no assertion of notability. I would say speedy but unfortunately, CSD A7 doesn't cover films. If this were released solely online, you could argue that its web content and then it might qualify under A7. Rackabello 05:18, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete Get yours here...etc. --Gavin Collins 13:00, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
• I got yours right here... Delete as non-notable and spamalicious. Tony Fox (arf!) 20:16, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
• Comment: Although there's no question the "get yours here!" bit is pure spam, doesn't IMDB inclusion suggest a semblance of notability? Kevin 21:01, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
• Keep Erik here. Sorry about the "get it here." I didn't mean to be "spammy" and I do admit that was over the top. Anyway, I fixed it. Also...the film has had two screenings and the DVD is officially out and will soon be available on Netflix (I will post the link as soon as I have it.) The film may also be premiering at the St. Louis International Film Festival but I am waiting on confirmation. So I ask that you keep it on here. Thanks. Erkman27 23:38, 21 September 2007 (CST)

• It needs to have multiple, non-trivial reliable sources to prove its notability. If you've had large amounts of media coverage that would count as reliable sources, I'd suggest adding that to the article. Generally, though, unless a film has received lots of coverage and some awards at major film festivals, it's not considered that notable. Tony Fox (arf!) 19:29, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
• Publicity articles have been added. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Erkman27 (talk • contribs) 19:39, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. Does not meet requirements of WP:NOTFILM or otherwise show notability. Eluchil404 23:52, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.