Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Galwegian black metal
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete Both per WP:SNOW. UltraExactZZ Claims ~ Evidence 19:24, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Galwegian black metal
Non-notable music genre - probably localized, regional or underground. Searching for the terms yields literally nothing apart from Wikipedia.[1] Wisdom89 (T / C) 00:33, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delete per above -- House of Scandal (talk) 00:45, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delete — zero evidence of being a notable musical genre. Appears to be a neologism of little note. --Haemo (talk) 00:46, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delete per above. Even the article itself admits there is only one band that falls in this genre (which means it is not a genre at all) and that reference is itself highly suspect and smacks of self-promotion. OlenWhitaker (talk) 01:34, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
- Comment: That band, Empörung, is also up for deletion. -- saberwyn 01:39, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
- I'm adding Galwegian Black Metal to this discussion, as it is an identical copy of Galwegian black metal. -- saberwyn 02:22, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delete both. unnotable and possible quasi-hoax. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 04:36, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:V.--h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 12:39, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
- Speedy delete as recreation (I tagged for A7) Will (talk) 17:42, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete; Snowball Clause This article doesn't even have a snowball's chance in hell of getting notability, has already been deleted once, and is either a hoax or extremely localized and underground; so there is no need to run it through the deletion process yet another time as of WP:SNOWBALL --MahaPanta (talk) 22:36, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.