Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gainax ending

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 09:19, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Gainax_ending

No original research. Unverifiable and not well-defined. There is no apparently no widely accept meaning of "Gainax Ending" other than an ending that doesn't satisfy the viewers. This is objective and not worth a wikipedia entry. The concept doesn't exist outside a select few anime circles, and is not even well-known in the anime world itself. No verifiable use of this term outside wikipedia, or other "answer" sources which borrow from wikipedia has been shown. There is no published record of this term. Mgio 05:29, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

• Strong Delete borders on an attack page. Danny Lilithborne 08:24, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete I actually found this page to be extremely interesting reading and I probably learned more from it than 99.99% of the other up-for-AfD articles I've read. However, I don't think this article can escape being basically a neologism (it does exist, but only recently and far from wide use). Hopefully the good parts can be merged into Series finale or other articles. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 13:50, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletions. -- TheFarix (Talk) 16:26, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as original research. --TheFarix (Talk) 16:26, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, OR and possible attack page. --Coredesat talk. ^_^ 02:43, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, fails WP:NEO miserably. –NeoChaosX [talk | contribs] 11:00, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete I'm gonna have to go with Starblind on this one - I found this article very interesting and although it may not be worthy of a page on it's own, it definitely needs to be merged into something. Hell, it's a lot more useful than "Penis panic", which I have never heard of in my entire life and sounds like a cheap pornographic video game. Daisee

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.