Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gaijin

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy keep per WP:SNOW. --Aaron 16:30, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Gaijin

Japanese POV articles Kng Dong-woo 12:14, 15 October 2006 (UTC) — Possible single purpose account: Kng Dong-woo (talk • contribs) has made few or no other contributions outside this topic.

  • Speedy keep. This is a real concept. Failure to comply with NPOV is not a reason for deletion by itself. MER-C 12:21, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. It looks NPOV to me anyway, reporting history, usage etc in a balanced manner. Tonywalton  | Talk 12:23, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Strong and Speedy Keep. As per all of the above. I can see absolutely no reason for its deletion. Pursey 12:27, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Speedy keep it is the japanese word for foreigner. AfD nomination appears to be vandalism. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Therin83 (talk • contribs)
  • Keep per above. Addhoc 12:41, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletions. -- Typq 13:07, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Strong Keep per above. No reason for deletion Matthuxtable 13:08, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Speedy Keep per above (NPOV, vandalism concerns) Neier 13:21, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Speedy keep, vandal deletion, also, it's not really pov at all. Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 13:32, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Strong Keep — "Gaijin" is also an English word (of Japanese origin). See this definition in American Heritage Dictionary.--Endroit 14:07, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Speedy Keep regardless of the nominators intentions. Clean it up if its thought to be POV --Arnzy (talk • contribs) 16:28, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.