Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gaga (hypothetical moon)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete - and damn you, Action Jackson IV, for making the joke I wanted to make. DS 02:25, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Gaga (hypothetical moon)

Pseudoscience with no reputable backing. No way of expanding article with facts. Pleclech 01:23, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. May be speedy, I see no context to this, nor do I see anything whatsoever backing this up as something that is anything more than somethiung made up in the observatory one day over drinks. --Dennisthe2 01:52, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete I'd just like to point out that Neptune was discovered in 1846 and Pluto was discovered in 1930 presumably with telescopes. Don't see how these could have been part of any culture's ancient mythology. --Infrangible 02:16, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
• Merge with Zecharia Sitchin. This page seems to be referring (although not particularly coherently) to an aspect of Sitchin's theories claiming that the gods in the ancient Sumerian "Epic of Creation" were not just mythological gods, but also were mapped actual astronomical bodies in the solar system. Not saying that I believe in it, but the theme of "maybe they knew something we didn't" is common in a lot of non-mainstream theories about ancient cultures. Mwelch 02:26, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
• Comment - I think we're missing the really important question: Is there an official radio station on this moon? :-D --Action Jackson IV 06:32, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Well, if there is, I sure ain't hearin' it. =^_^= --Dennisthe2 01:21, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
• Weak Merge/Delete Some valid information? Dfrg.msc 09:29, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. It may indeed be part of one of those "well this rogue gravitational influence moved all this stuff around, in the past, y'know?", but then it should be part of one of those articles, as pointed out above. Shenme 10:10, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
• Merge and Delete to the Nibiru article. Fails WP:ATT, but certainly matches WP:BULLSHIT with flying colors, bravo! RGTraynor 16:22, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Article has only one sentence, with no real info, and no sources/references whatsoever, even now 6 months after it was created. --Seattle Skier (talk) 21:13, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. No sources, possible hoax, send it into its own orbit. Realkyhick 21:30, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Send this one off into the black hole. It's probably a hoax anyway. --sunstar net^talk 00:10, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.