Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GSI Commerce

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. - Mailer Diablo 06:21, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] GSI Commerce

GSI Commerce (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Page was flagged with AfD notice as "not notable" by contributor with no other edits. The editor did not finish the nomination and did not respond when contacted so I am finishing the listing as an act of good faith, although I have added sources that I believe establish notability. --TexasDex 23:08, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

• Keep I share that belief. Regular keep because, as a procedural listing, this would be a borderline SK case. -- Seed 2.0 12:44, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
• Keep. The article has good secondary sources, like this entry at Reuters, also mentioned by Forbes, so meets WP:ORG. PeaceNT 14:55, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
• Keep Good sources, no need to delete. --ImmortalGoddezz 15:22, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
• Keep. Good references. Good job TexasDex.—Gaff ^ταλκ 18:12, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.