Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GODWIN WILSON

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 06:14, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] GODWIN WILSON

Not speediable (notability asserted through publications) but possibly not prominent enough either. No Vote exolon 19:14, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

• Delete - No reliable sources provided and Google hits are less than impressive. Not that its reason for deletion, but its one of the ugliestly (?) formatted articles I've seen. This looks like it was in all likelihood copy/pasted from somewhere as well. Wickethewok 19:31, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. This is a repost of an article that was deleted once already today. This page should be added to this nomination: Wilson, Godwin. ---Charles 19:35, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete non-notable vanity article. Sam Clark 19:45, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, WP is not the place to post resumes or CVs. -- Merope ^Talk 19:58, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.