The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was to Delete the article. --Konst.ableTalk 11:42, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
Despite the author's claim in an edit summary that this has been cleaned up, it is still an essay or fork of geographic information system. -- RHaworth 19:11, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
Agree with nominator most of it looks like spam, and the article name is not appropriate — Nearly Headless Nick{L} 10:58, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
Reluctant delete. Obviously someone tried hard to make this an encyclopedia article, but failed on WP:POVFORK as well as basic spelling and grammar. No encyclopedic merit in this form. Sandstein 20:42, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.