Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GFI Software

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was KEEP. JeremyA 22:23, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)

[edit] GFI Software

This is an advert for GFI. If they want to sell their products they should do it on their own space. The article has little scholarly value. Recommend deletion. Snarfevs 15:21, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)

A portion off the article seems to be copy-pasted off of their page: http://www.gfi.com/company/

This may be a copyright violation (although I doubt GFI would enforce it). --12.44.50.252 18:09, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)

• Keep, on probation Thisone needs verification, rewriting and wikification. If they _are_ as big as they are, in the field as they state, why no notice before? Delete logo. -Snorre/Antwelm 14:30, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep with changes I made, unless its new stublike quality indicates that it should never have been an article at all. All of the images have been (well... are being) submitted under imagevio for deletion. --Dachannien 15:09, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep as now edited. DS1953 18:13, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• keep please since its been edited Yuckfoo 20:35, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep and expand. Well done, Dachannien. Capitalistroadster 00:51, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep and expand. Nice editing from Dachannien. JamesBurns 02:20, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep In hindsight a cut down was all that was necessary - thanks Dachannien :) Snarfevs 03:06, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep You 20:26, Jun 11, 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.