Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GCML series cricket
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Punkmorten (talk) 20:33, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] GCML series cricket
Non-notable amateur social cricket competition. No evidence of notability or mainstream coverage has been provided Mattinbgn\talk 05:18, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- Mattinbgn\talk 05:18, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. —Mattinbgn\talk 05:20, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
Comment The article refers to a Nitin Gupta who appears to have had an article on him deleted on numerous occasions. Further note this earlier discussion - Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GCML Series Cricket -- Mattinbgn\talk 05:26, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
- Delete – not notable team.--Grahame (talk) 08:34, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete as a recreation. While not word for word - if it's not notable in December and nothing has changed, it wouldn't be notable now. --SmashvilleBONK! 16:39, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
- Delete, per arguments in the previous discussion. I don't have access to the old, deleted version of the page, but this looks pretty familiar, so it may also be a CSD G4. Lankiveil (speak to me) 08:59, 22 May 2008 (UTC).
-
- If I remember correctly, it's not a direct G4. The old one had a lot more ad-language. --SmashvilleBONK! 16:05, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.