Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GBC LP DBA Tower

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete all. Renata 06:18, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] GBC LP DBA Tower

Pinnacle Towers Tower La Feria (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

South Carolina Educational TV tower Sumter (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Grant Radio Tower Carrolton (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

KPXE Tower (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Apparently undistinguished and dismantled radio and TV towers whcih do not appear noteable in any way whatsoever, as far as I can tell. None of these articles have any substantial additional information. Ohconfucius 03:50, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

• Delete As none of them are realistically notable, and all of the information is already in the List of massts, why spearate articles for each of them??SkierRMH,06:47, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete all Until NONTRIVIAL REFERENCES can be provided for each of these, they are by default non-notable. --Jayron32 07:01, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete all per above. MER-C 07:53, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
• Keep All All of these towers may seem foolish to some, but this is actually very useful information. The author wasn't just trying to write about one tower near there house. They made a bunch of articles, got sources, looked up coordinates, etc. They're harmless, even if they are for a niche reader. Mets 08:36, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete all, unless references are cited from independent resources. Terence Ong 14:04, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete all Without any guideline or other source which has criteria these meet, and without multiple independent reliable sources showing their notability, I see no basis for having articles about them. Not every identifiable thing with data in a website or book somewhere needs an article. Edison 20:09, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
• delete Almost harmless perhaps individually. But collectively articles such as these make Wikipedia worse, and encourage more of the same. Anyway basis for deletion is WP:NOTindiscriminate information.Obina 21:18, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete all. Inclusion in List of masts is the best way to present this information. If a particular tower has some separate notability, because a giant ape climbs it or whatever, then a separate article would be fine. JamesMLane t c 12:03, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete All per above. Vegaswikian 03:43, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.