Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/G3 telecom

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 05:39, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] G3 telecom

G3 telecom (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

This article is a very clear and serious violation of Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. The initial two edits were by Gr8rates (talk · contribs), who has no other edits. An IP address has also made 5 edits to this article and no other edits. Thus, all the substantive page history comes from a single-purpose user who has no other interest in Wikipedia whatsoever. It's not as if this telecom company is a shining example of a notable corporation. If it were, someone else would have created a neutral article. To me, the removal of such COI articles is a form of housekeeping, but of course other opinions are welcome as always. Shalom (Hello • Peace) 03:35, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

• Delete or rewrite - Probable COI, reads like an ad. OSborn^arf 03:39, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - COI and SPAM. Spawn Man 04:02, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete This is clearly COI. A quick goolge search shows up very few or no reliable hits for this article. It is also difficult to verify the contents of this article as well. --Siva1979^{Talk to me} 04:47, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:COI. Blatent advertising ffm 17:12, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
• How is writing an article about a company/service I found useful on the net a violation?

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.