Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/G0y

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete.SoothingR 21:14, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] G0y

Unremarkable protologism with roughly 500 Google hits on a restrictive search[1], few of which are related. No evidence of widespread use. No vote. Adrian Lamo ·· 04:45, 13 February 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. NN and we're not a dictionary. Mikker ^... 04:57, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
• D0l0t0. ←Humus sapiens ^ну? 05:25, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete and bet my last dollar that this is made up one day at school. --Kinu 05:58, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. --Eliezer | £€åV€ m€ å m€§§åg€ 15:43, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Kinu. -- Krash (Talk) 22:50, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep / Merge a significant term in gay forums and IRC rooms, as stupid as it sounds. [2] --Tintin2 23:39, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete and see if UrbanDictionary wants it. Haikupoet 02:42, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep / Merge as above. While it sounds ridiculous it is a significant term in forums/chat. Prepbot 05:18, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.