Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/G.r.s. mead

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedy keep - nomination withdrawn, no votes to delete (ESkog)^(Talk) 01:31, 13 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] G.r.s. mead

This article contains no content, just a list of see also's-- xaosflux ^Talk/_CVU 05:01, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

• Comment If content is added to this article to bring it up to stub qualifications, then consider this a WITHDRAW.

I'm working on it right now (smiley face) Wjhonson 05:06, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

• Keep, as it is now it seems like a worthwhile stub, lots of mentions of his work already in WP. I've moved this article to G.R.S. Mead. Makemi 05:17, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

Original poster withdrew if destub so I'm deleting del flag which is really annoying to edit around. Please give a person at least ten minutes before marking del. Not everyone creates full-blown bios at soon as they start ;) Thanks. Wjhonson 05:46, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

• Speedy keep per nominators comment since it now has content -- Astrokey44|talk 15:29, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Keep, nomination withdrawn, article has been developed. xaosflux ^Talk/_CVU 17:33, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

I would have thought that "consider this a withdraw" means "anyone may withdraw it" versus "only the original person who tagged it may withdraw it". Please clarify. Thanks. Wjhonson 17:41, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.