Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/G.114

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was KEEP. Golbez 06:16, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] G.114

It's a rather technical somethingorother about some telecommunications protocol (I think). NN, anyway. Jeffrey O. Gustafson 08:42, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)

• Keep. We already have these ITU-T recommendations. Hopefully a VfD nomination will spur someone into making this into a proper article. -- RHaworth 10:47, 2005 Jun 12 (UTC)
• Keep, notable. Kappa 11:03, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep Noteable. ConeyCyclone 17:47, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Account created 17:05, 12 Jun 2005 and mostly used to vote on VfD's. Kaibabsquirrel 21:17, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep and expand. Has marginal notability. JamesBurns 04:17, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Comment I'm sorry, but this article has severe problems. If G.114 is notable, can someone please put in the article, more clearly, what G.114 is (because, honsetly, what's there makes little sense), and explain why it's notable. Notability should always be established in an article. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson 00:42, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.