Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/G-Unit MidWest

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. —Wknight94 (talk) 01:13, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] G-Unit MidWest

G-Unit MidWest (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

non notable record label. G-unit is notable, this one is not. Further, there are absolutely 0 sources, it is entirely original research, and it is rife with "rumor" ⇒ SWATJester ^{On Belay!} 21:39, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

• Keep this article reason the only it is being nominated is because people go in there and put false claims. Whenever i created the article i put the truth into it.Tru Soulja 18:03, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. Non-notable record label, 0 sources. People adding false claims to an article is not a valid deletion reason; if people have done so, remove that false information and provide sources for the rest. --Geniac 08:40, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

• Delete per Geniac. Non-notable and unsourced. --Nick—^Contact/_Contribs 13:23, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

• Keep real record label just not signing artists until 2008 i sent a message to Trick-Trick myself and he told me.74.241.139.205 20:35, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

• Delete unsourced. not a real label.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.