Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/G-Corporation
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 09:11, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] G-Corporation
nn fictional company--Sss666 05:23, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
- Why should it be deleted? - The 4th Snake
- Per Wikipedia:Notability (fiction), "Major and notable minor characters (and places, concepts, etc.) in a work of fiction should be covered within the article on that work of fiction. If an encyclopedic treatment of such a character causes the article on the work itself to become long, then that character can be given a separate article." Under that guideline, there's no reason for a one-line stub on a minor character or place, or in this case, company. Delete. Fan-1967 15:01, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
- Also per that guideline, the way to solve this is to merge it into a list of places in Tekken article, to parallel the list of minor Tekken characters, not delete it. Uncle G 18:43, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
- Per Wikipedia:Notability (fiction), "Major and notable minor characters (and places, concepts, etc.) in a work of fiction should be covered within the article on that work of fiction. If an encyclopedic treatment of such a character causes the article on the work itself to become long, then that character can be given a separate article." Under that guideline, there's no reason for a one-line stub on a minor character or place, or in this case, company. Delete. Fan-1967 15:01, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and per reference by Fan-1967. --Dennis The TIger 02:01, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - per nom. Zaxem 02:25, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
- Why not add more information? - The 4th Snake
- Delete, per nom. Utterly pointless article. Terraxos 17:24, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. Daveydweeb (chat/patch) 03:34, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
