Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fyo

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was high-velocity frag. Resurgent insurgent (as admin) 02:46, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fyo

Fyo (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

If ever I saw an "Indiscernible or unclassifiable topic", this is surely it. I was all set to delete this as G1, but have had a moment of doubt & bringing it over for a second opinion. Maybe there's something lost in translation here. — iridescent 00:35, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

  • Speedy Frag -unless a good editor was suddenly gripped by adspeak... David Fuchs (talk) 00:38, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Ultra Speedy Delete I take a few issues with this "article," especially the emoticon toward the end. Badly written, and it's not needed in an encyclopedia. Oh, and I like David's "Speedy Frag" up there. Quite creative. —Signed by KoЯnfan71 My Talk Sign Here! 00:45, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
By my insidious use, all delete votes will be replaced with 'frag'. David Fuchs (talk) 01:03, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Find your own delete. I can't see that this meets any of the speedy criteria, but this doesn't have a snowball's chance of being kept. Deor 00:50, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. I would suggest this is 100% original research, but that does rather a disservice to the term "research". Perhaps WP:SNOWBALL because Wikipedia is not for something you made up in school one day. Accounting4Taste 00:54, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Fyo is that little voice in your head that tells all the stupid people in this planet not to steal, not to do drugs and not to kill. Let's be on the lookout in case he gets them to sign up and support a "keep". It may be one of the most nicest things on earth, but it's bound to flip out when it hears this article is up for deletion. Thomjakobsen 00:59, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Mega Speedy Delete and disentigrate with a Death star blast Ugh, what IS this? Delete it, fast. DBZROCKSIts over 9000!!! 01:03, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete As the illegitimare offspring of a self help seminar. Calgary 01:37, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete As per all above! Tiptoety 02:19, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete G1 - patent nonsense, i.e. "Content that, while apparently meaningful after a fashion, is so completely and irredeemably confused that no reasonable person can be expected to make any sense of it whatsoever." Hal peridol 02:29, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete per overwhelming unanimy... how did this make it to AfD anyway? JuJube 02:41, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.