Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fuzzy Things

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 00:23, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Fuzzy Things

Take a look at this Australasian Furry community here. Have a look at the plethora of different Furry art/comic/fiction sites they host. One of these, is the webcomic Fuzzy Things, seen here. The entire furry.org.au domain returns an Alexa ranking of 300,000, maybe it's a notable furry community that's a different discussion, but is a one site out of the scores that are hosted there particularly notable? I don't think so, I don't think it is any more notable than any of the other sites hosted on that Furry community, and they aren't. - Hahnchen 00:03, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

• Keep - one of the few longstanding non-yiffy Furry webcomics. - Synapse 01:13, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
• This has been listed on Wikipedia:WikiProject Webcomics/Deletion. –Abe Dashiell ^(t/c) 01:25, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as something of very limited interest. This should go to WikiFur. Brian G. Crawford 02:00, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. This is a legitimate and long-running web comic. It seems that there's some sort of guilt by association or non-notability by association going on here, instead of judging this on its own merits. Madman 03:29, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
• DeleteWikipedia is not adveritsement for furry comics. Gold Stur 04:57, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions. -- Capitalistroadster 04:01, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, ~311,000 on Alexa, "'Fuzzy Things' Sario" returns 603 hits on Google. -Objectivist-C 05:21, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. Eusebeus 11:00, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, nn webcomic. --Terence Ong 12:26, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Not sufficiently notable, long-running or not. Bucketsofg 13:47, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete all webcomics not syndicated in no-trivial treeware. Just zis Guy you know? 14:13, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:WEB.--Isotope23 15:27, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Seems like everyday on Wikipedia another non-notable comic turns up. --Knucmo2 15:28, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete nn. --Eivind^t@c 20:57, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep: a ranking of 300k from the severely flawed alexa seems good enough. Dread Lord CyberSkull ✎☠ 23:12, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete nn  Funky Monkey  (talk)  00:58, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete nn. --Roisterer 02:49, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
• Comment - Please consider what Madman wrote above: "It seems that there's some sort of guilt by association or non-notability by association going on here, instead of judging this on its own merits". -- Synapse 14:51, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep --Haham hanuka 09:02, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
• Weak Keep Seems notable enough, but barely. Startup account 23:11, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.