Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fuxd

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was - deleted - SimonP 05:13, Mar 30, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Fuxd

Non-notable misspelling of fucked. Gets 389 unique google hits; about one out of seven are used in this way, and most of the rest are gibberish. Does Wiktionary take ebonicsisms? I hope not. —Korath (Talk) 13:44, Mar 15, 2005 (UTC)

• Delexd. Non-notable. Android79 13:58, Mar 15, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete doesn't belong here, and is not widespread enough for wikitionary. If we're going to be super-charitable we could make it a redirect to fuck but even that is questionable. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 14:54, Mar 15, 2005 (UTC)
• delete - DavidWBrooks 14:56, 15 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, not notable, neologism. Megan1967 05:18, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• DO Not Delete : Word used commonly in many parts of canada now. Infact replacing the use of fucked. Usually preffered to Fucked. 69.197.237.13 12:34, Mar 16, 2005 (UTC) (moved from talk page—Korath (Talk) 16:01, Mar 16, 2005 (UTC))
  • Wikipedia is not a dictionary, especially not for dubious neologisms. Android79 13:12, Mar 16, 2005 (UTC) (moved from talk page—Korath (Talk) 16:01, Mar 16, 2005 (UTC))
• Delete, eh. Edeans 21:24, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.