Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fuuga

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge. Daniel J. Leivick (talk) 02:32, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Fuuga

Fuuga (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Unnotable fictional group from the manga/anime series GetBackers. Completely fails WP:FICT and already sufficiently covered in List of GetBackers characters. Failed PROD removed by anon IP with no reason given. Collectonian (talk) 19:10, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. —Collectonian (talk) 19:11, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Merge It's bad that this article consists mostly of plot and is almost entirely unsourced, but it seems there are some real-world content sentences in there, e.g. "The original idea of creating the Fuuga was voiced by Saizou" and "Ayamine Rando has voiced his opinion, in one of the free talk slots in the manga, that Fuuga and VOLTS are two very similar groups". Maybe I'm mixing real people with fictional characters, but still, a few producer comments do not automatically justify a separate article. Those should be merged though, not deleted. – sgeureka t•c 08:30, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
    Actually no, a few producer comments do not "automatically" justify a separate article. To meet WP:FICT, the character and/or place must have significant coverage in third-party sources, not just a few producer comments. Collectonian (talk) 16:22, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Given the rest of the sentence, I think that was a typo and he meant to include a "not". Merge per Sguereka. --erachima talk 06:03, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Yes, it was a typo. I added the "not". – sgeureka t•c 06:43, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
  • I thought that was a bit odd :P Collectonian (talk) 06:49, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Merge - per above, some out-of-universe context that could be merged. Needs to be sourced though. Sephiroth BCR (Converse) 06:37, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Merge, non-notable except as search term. Fee Fi Foe Fum (talk) 23:53, 3 May 2008 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.