Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Futurism (Clothes philosophy)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 01:10, 26 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Futurism (Clothes philosophy)

This seems to be original research, or at least research which has no academic recognision. Futurism "Tom Windram" has no google hits. See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom Windram. Thue | talk 16:07, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

• Delete as per WP:V unless reliable sources are provided to verify the claims of this article. --Allen3 ^talk 16:11, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
• Strong Keep I have heard of this. I even have some articles of verification i believe, though it really is obscure and will take at least a day to find them. Perhaps change the word 'famous'?—Preceding unsigned comment added by Coinman (talk • contribs) 16:12, February 20, 2006 (UTC)

Comment: Coinman was the creator of this article. Monkeyman 16:34, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

• Delete as per nom. Bobby1011 16:17, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Vanity, nn, original research, pick your reason. --Aaron 16:30, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete pretty sure this is a joke, or at least tongue-in-cheek (read the "criticism to the criticism" section, for example). Even if not, it's covered by WP:NOR. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 16:31, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Aaron. I pick all of them. Monkeyman 16:34, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete There is no such thing as clothes philosophy, other than "Buy what ELLE magazine tells you to buy" --Ruby 16:38, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. This article claims that this is the basis of a nudist movement in Perth and Adelaide. There has been no coverage of this in the Australian media or other media and the media normally loves to cover stories involving nudity (normally with a wide angle. This is unverifiable. A Google search for futurism Windram came up with four results see [1]. Capitalistroadster 18:22, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
• "
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions. -- Capitalistroadster 18:34, 20 February 2006 (UTC)".Capitalistroadster 18:34, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. --Roisterer 08:53, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.