Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Function Recordings

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Dmcdevit·t 07:25, August 17, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Function Recordings

As a matter of VfD closing policy, I'm extending discussion on all VfDs that get two comments or less in addition to the nomination. This discussion is extended for another five days. No vote. --Tony Sidaway^Talk 22:08, 9 August 2005 (UTC)

UK-based record label, seems non-notable. There seems to be a more notable Finnish label of the same name; if somebody deems that one eligible for inclusion then the article should be rewritten. Otherwise, Delete. Joel7687 16:39, 2 August 2005 (UTC)

• Delete If you follow the links posted, you end up at http://www.timelessmusic.org/ as the homepage of "Function" which states that it was last updated in September of 2003. Not notable. — Linnwood ^(talk) 23:26, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. --Carnildo 22:30, 9 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. There's hardly any content, and we're not a web guide. The UK (not Finnish) company doesn't seem very notable either. --IByte 22:58, 9 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. - brenneman^(t)(c) 01:01, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
• delete does not establish notability --Tim Pope 16:53, 10 August 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.