Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fumadores

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. - Mailer Diablo 16:58, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fumadores

Fumadores (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Prod. The article has been prodded and restored beforehand so I'm bringing it here. Personally, I think it fails to assert its significance. -- lucasbfr ^talk 22:31, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

• Delete - non-notable cruft. Tim^V.B._{{critic & speak}} 23:11, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
• Fine, fine, fine. Go ahead and delete it, since everyone is determined this is crap. I give up. Have it your way. Glacierman 01:14, 10 June 2007 (UTC) Calmer response below.
• Keep. Slim article so far, but doesn't appear more or less notable than any other cigar brand. Perhaps an {{expand}} template for now, but I don't see any compelling reason to delete. Ford MF 06:03, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
• Keep as per Ford MF. The article does need more to it, but this is a very new brand of cigar, of course the article will be in its infancy stages. It seems notable enough, so leave it. T. Moitie ^[talk] 14:09, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
• Keep. It may be a stub, but it seems to be notable. —Disavian (^talk/_contribs) 20:35, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
• Keep. Blood pressure is down again *grin*. As has been noted above, it is a new brand. The notabililty is tied to the creator/maker, Pepin Garcia. When more is known, it will be added. Glacierman 02:37, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.