Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Full outer shell

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was - redirected - SimonP 14:31, Jun 14, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Full outer shell

non-encyclopaedic babbling Ben davison 00:16, 30 May 2005 (UTC)

• Speedy delete. Generated by software. Pavel Vozenilek 00:29, 30 May 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect to noble gas, and merge any useful information. -- BD2412 ^talk 00:42, 2005 May 30 (UTC)
• Redirect to noble gas -- Rune Welsh ταλκ 01:03, May 30, 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect Fawcett5 04:05, 30 May 2005 (UTC)
• No, don't redirect to noble gas, any element can have a full outer shell by gaining or losing electrons. Kappa 06:16, 30 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Egad - I was thinking only in terms of atoms, not molecules. You are correct, sir! I therefore join my colleagues below in saying redirect to valence shell. -- BD2412 ^talk 22:04, 2005 May 30 (UTC)
• Keep and rewrite, or put more content into Valence shell and redirect. This information is useful, because the Valence shell article makes no mention of the effect of having a full outer shell. We're jumping the gun by nominating it for deletion because it's not written properly, regardless of whether it was computer generated. --Barfooz (talk) 06:29, 30 May 2005 (UTC)
• Merge and redirect useful info in Valence shell per Barfooz. We need info on full outer shells, but not in the current format. Mgm|^(talk) 07:05, May 30, 2005 (UTC)
• Merge and redirect to Valence shell. -Sholtar | talk 07:08, May 30, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep and completely rewrite. This could be a useful topic as per Barfooz. Megan1967 09:08, 30 May 2005 (UTC)
• Merge and redirect to valence shell; this is a concept most usefully discussed in context. --TenOfAllTrades (talk/contrib) 17:19, 30 May 2005 (UTC)
• Rewrite It needs an introduction so that the reader immediately knows what the topic is about. But it looks worthy of its own topic if it is cleaned up a bit. Sonic Mew 20:32, May 30, 2005 (UTC)
• keep, but in big need of a rewrite. The article should remain, however, no need for merge/redirect. UkPaolo 22:14, 30 May 2005 (UTC)
• Merge useful content into Valence shell and redirect. Many things have outer shells; the fullness described here is only relevant to electron valence levels. Heck, my car has a valance (two a's, one e) panel under the front bumper with a full outer shell after I drive through mud. Barno 19:35, 31 May 2005 (UTC)
• Keep with rewrite. JamesBurns 08:49, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect to valence shell. -- Cyrius|✎ 03:49, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.