Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Full magazine

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. fails WP:WEB --Madchester 09:42, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Full magazine

Non-notable online magazine. Zero Google hits. Vanity article (created by magazine's creator). It's not clear what an "underground" website is. eaolson 02:46, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete. nn-advertisement. --Madchester 02:49, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete unless substantial content and evidence of notability is forthcoming. Richardjames444 02:52, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete clearly a vanity article. --Edgelord 03:17, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
  • dont delete give a boy a chance he clearly loves this website —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Nicklink (talk • contribs) 22:31, 7 August 2006.
Comment Sorry, but you are going to need a better reason than that for this article to be kept. --Edgelord 04:12, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per above. Michael 06:06, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete an "online magazine" should have some Google hits. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 11:31, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom Localzuk (talk) 14:07, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
  • A MANS VALIDITY CANNOT BE MEASURED WITH GOOGLE HITS PLEASE RECONSIDER —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Nicklink (talk • contribs) 11:55, 8 August 2006.
  • A man's validity cannot be measured with a Wikipedia article. nn, vanity. Delete. User:Zoe|(talk) 17:08, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom and removal of the AFD from the article. Ryūlóng 21:58, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. This should remain, I found it to be interesting... and no one should be deprived of an opportunity to see this on wikipedia, the Free encyclopedia... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 72.141.255.88 (talk • contribs) 14:17, 9 August 2006.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.