Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fug (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedy Delete by Geogre as recreation of previously deleted content. --GraemeL ^(talk) 00:16, 26 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Fug (2nd nomination)

• delete deleted previously for being a dicdef. Dicdef is back; now an nn forum and a typo have been added. --Trovatore 23:03, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy delete G4. Have tagged it as such. --howcheng [ talk • contribs • web ] 23:23, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy delete per G4. Saberwyn 23:36, 25 October 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.