Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fuego (Spanish Version)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete --- Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 20:19, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Fuego (Spanish Version)

Fuego (Spanish Version) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Duplicates content found at the Fuego (The Cheetah Girls song) article. Most content has also been removed. PROD was contested by page author. --lifebaka (Talk - Contribs) 00:38, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

  • Redirects are cheap. --Canley (talk) 00:44, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Merge/Redirect, it's more-or-less that already - just mention who did the Spanish version on the main article and you're done. Hersfold (t/a/c) 03:46, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
  • DELETE --Duennschiss (talk) 09:26, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
    Comment Would you care to comment on why? AfD is more than just a vote. Hersfold (t/a/c) 12:46, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete: I'll comment on why: is the redirect useful? No. Is someone going to be typing in "Fuego (Spanish Version)" in hopes of finding what the redirect would be to? No. Is there some vital reason to preserve the work of the editor in history? No. Is there some part of the present article that is useful or explanatory? No. At present, it has no context and no description or explanation (hence the "it's almost there now" -- almost as empty as a redirect). I cannot see any reason to make this a redirect, and it's clearly a violation of deletion guidelines. Utgard Loki (talk) 14:14, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
    • Agreed, this is not at all a likely search term and there's no reason for it to be left as a redirect. TRAVELLINGCARIMy storyTell me yours 18:39, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete as per nom. Agree that redirect is pointless per the reasons Utgard Loki gives.  Esradekan Gibb  "Talk" 23:14, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.