Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fuckton

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedy deleted, though someone should really take a crack at rewriting this one in a good way. --Cyde Weys 03:47, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Fuckton

Not only is this article almost assuredly incorrect (I've been using "fuckton" for a years before today), it seems like an attempt by a Slashdot user to claim notoriety via Wikipedia. At best, "fuckton" is a Wiktionary entry. FreelanceWizard 02:30, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

• Speedy delete, a neologism if ever there was one. User:Zoe|^(talk) 02:48, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete for the above reasons. -- Kicking222 03:29, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. -Objectivist-C 03:37, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete I get tired of all the slashdot related articles. Cvene64 04:44, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete or move to Wiktionary. Like FreelanceWizard, I've been using and hearing this word for years, but it's non-notable slang. --Allen 04:44, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
• Transwiki to Wictionary. 37,200 Google hits. I'm impressed. --Hyperbole 04:53, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

• Comment Is it really worth TransWiking in its current state? -Objectivist-C 05:03, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

• Well, I suppose what I mean is "delete the article, but create a Wictionary entry under 'Fuckton'" --Hyperbole 05:27, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. Childish NN. Moriori 08:27, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, nn. --Terence Ong 14:08, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. It's only been around one day, as of this writing, and there's no way the word could have gained notability yet. --Elkman - ^(talk) 18:10, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

• Speedy delete per Elkman. --Bardak 20:48, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete per all. -MrFizyx 21:01, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - I might start using this evocative term, but unfortunately it's still a NN neologism. --rehpotsirhc ^{█♣█ ▪ Talk} 23:06, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete nn  Funky Monkey  (talk)  01:17, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.