Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fucknoob

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedied under G1. --Evilclown93_(talk) 22:56, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fucknoob

Fucknoob (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Non-notable neologism. It is not documented that the term is commonly used. Gathers about 300 hits on Google, of which at least 200 seem to be someones actual username. Pekaje 14:29, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. Utter nonsense. Get rid of it. Now. WWGB 14:47, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
• Delete this should have been speddy deleted, it's nonsense. OysterGuitarst 21:28, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
  • While I agree in principle, this looks like a (non-notable) neologism, which is generally considered a non-criterion for speedy deletion (unless very obvious, which I don't think this one is). There is a chance that this is indeed a commonly used phrase in gaming (I actually wouldn't be surprised), which someone else might be able to find evidence of. --Pekaje 22:15, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.