Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fruit fetishism

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was KEEP, once I've finished rolling on the floor at the witticisms our finest Wikipedians can display when they put their minds to it ;) -Splash 01:21, 9 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Fruit fetishism

Speedy delete. The current version is unacceptable. --Ghirlandajo 15:58, 1 September 2005 (UTC)

The article has been rewritten. It is alright now. I withdraw my nomination. --Ghirlandajo 06:19, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete Nonsense. KeithD (talk) 16:07, 1 September 2005 (UTC) Keep. I didn't think it possible, but BD2412 has turned this into a worthy article. KeithD (talk) 19:13, 1 September 2005 (UTC)

*Delete per referer. Keep good rewrite DV8 2XL 22:38, 1 September 2005 (UTC)

  • weak keep extremely poorly written, but a legitimate subject. Not that I would know. If the current version is not acceptable, then cleanup and rewrite as a stub. Roodog2k 16:24, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete — No sour grapes, it's just bananas. — RJH 16:38, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
    • Keep — Looking peachy now. — RJH 20:18, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Weak keep Can be expanded...Amren (talk) 16:47, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete — no real content, but I will look into it and if there's any documented evidence that this exists I'll write a proper article about it. You never know what people find kinky - for now dump it --Outlander 18:43, September 1, 2005 (UTC)Too late, BD2412 already re-wrote it Change to Keep---Outlander 19:41, September 1, 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep but rewrite. I may be in a pickle for saying there's no reason to squash this topic - the current version is nonsense, but a well written article on the topic would be a peach. -- BD2412 talk 18:48, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
    • Note - I have tossed the old, and put a totally cherry work in its place. -- BD2412 talk 19:06, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep BDA's excellent rewrite. All these puns are a bit hard on the ol' melon. android79 19:23, September 1, 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep - It's Wiki-worthy enough... UniReb 21:30, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep and allow for orgasmic growth. —RaD Man (talk) 06:31, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep, is a clear FA candidate. Proto t c 09:10, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
    • comment modified my vote again to no modifier. Guess we're out of the pickle, peachy rewrite is cherry, the apple of someone's eye. Good thing we didn't squash the article before it was ripe. Orange you all glad that everything came out OK in the end? Roodog2k (talk) 10:46, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
      • The references are a nice touch, but I guess when this vote is over, olive without them. -- BD2412 talk 03:29, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.