Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frugby (2nd nomination)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete again. Mangojuicetalk 17:40, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Frugby
Wikipedia is not for things made up in school one day, or even over several days. No evidence that this has any significance outside local area where it was made up. Note - there's enough difference between this article and the one that was AFD'd in 2005 (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frugby) that it seems to deserve another go-round here. FreplySpang 22:34, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete stupid. Danny Lilithborne 08:01, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Does not seem important at all. No seriously organised leagues or tournaments. Julius Sahara 08:34, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - does not even claim notability. Would be a speedy A7 if it weren't for the earlier article. Lyrl Talk C 00:11, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.