Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frozen treat

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE. Postdlf 02:20, 2 May 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Frozen treat

Delete Article explaining that a Frozen treat is a treat which is frozen, and some nonsense about them being best eaten warm. Do we need this? Given the vandalism-fest that 213.249.155.242 (contributions) was on at the time they created this article, I doubt it was seriously intended. Anilocra 12:03, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)

• Redirect to Freezing which covers frozen foods, such as ice cream. — RJH 14:40, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete for silly content. Redirect iff the vandal shows up again and re-posts the article. --Idont Havaname 14:50, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy delete as nonsense. Firebug 18:25, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Jayjg ^(talk) 05:44, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Doesn't make a good redirect. --Carnildo 22:32, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, wikipedia has several articles that this can point to. Gazpacho 19:52, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect to Freezing as per RJH. This article adds no info. FreplySpang (talk) 19:59, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete while frozen treat seems a common enough term, Wikipipedia is not a cookbook and a frozen treat is hardly one of the worlds great dishes. Andypasto 08:58, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.