Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frosty Wooldridge (2nd nomination)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. W.marsh 18:21, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Frosty Wooldridge
Delete fails WP:BIO No claim of notability is made sufficient for inclusion within Wikipedia or any other encyclopedia. Brimba 16:29, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
Delete per nom --Splette :) Talk 17:01, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as per nom. Fails WP:BIO Xdenizen 19:41, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
- Weak keep -- lots of Google hits about his writings. I had never heard of him, but he seems to be a moderately notable published writer. Kestenbaum 20:38, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
- Keep - I looked for reviews for the book, "Immigration's Unarmed Invasion", and I found dozens. Granted, they were mostly right-wing borderline websites, so it's hard to say if they qualify as "independent" reviews. Nevertheless, there seems to be enough out there to arguably satisfy WP:BIO and establish minimum notablity for an article. So, I reluctantly say "keep". -Kubigula (ave) 23:46, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. A further indication of notability is that SPLC thinks he's worth denouncing. JamesMLane t c 08:19, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
