Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Front Line Force

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. W.marsh 21:55, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Front Line Force

Mod that doesn't seem to particularly notable. Fails WP:V and WP:RS. Delete per lack of reliable sources. Wickethewok 19:28, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

• Keep I have to disagree with the nominator over this. Firstly, a google search shows more than 100 000 hits on this mod. Moreover, this mod is for a very popular PC game, Half-Life. There is also an impartial review of this mod on this website as well. In conclusion, this article meets WP:VERIFY guidelines. --Siva1979^{Talk to me} 20:09, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
• DeleteNo claim of encyclopedic notability. Bwithh 20:33, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Come back when as notable as Red Orchestra or Counter-Strike. L0b0t 22:50, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. -- moe.RON ^{Let's talk | done} 20:17, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - I really can not be bothered to edit articles in the games-mod space, I've got more interesting things to do. But this is a notable mod. Valve Software hired Adrian Finol off this, Valve liked the mod so much, they donated a map for the mod team to use (Avanti from Team Fortress Classic). I have multiple reviews of this from PCZone. And just a google search will give you some more ammo [1]. The above gamespy link was pretty trivial, a list of 10 top Half-Life mods, but Gamespy also hosted 2 proper feature interviews with the FLF team seen here and here. If you want I can put in a list of PCZ print references into the article, but I can't be bothered to tidy the thing up. - Hahnchen 05:31, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - Per Hahnchen. The Kinslayer 10:26, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.