The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. – RobertT | @ | C 00:26, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
Delete A commendable group, but with a budget under $250,000, only a couple of years old, and helping less than 20 people at present, I just don't see where this group is sufficiently notable to be considered encyclopedic. Caerwine 16:51, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
Delete per nomination --RaiderAspect 23:48, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
Delete Izehar 22:25, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.