Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Friedens Lutheran Church

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jay(Reply) 06:29, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Friedens Lutheran Church

Friedens Lutheran Church (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Delete not notable, not verifiable per WP:CHURCH. --Адам Райли Talk 06:01, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete per nom. MER-C 07:03, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. -- Bpmullins | Talk 19:16, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak delete 150 years is pretty old for a church in Wisconsin, and if members searched the newspaper clip files at the local historical society, or the historical files at the denomination's archives, they might just find enough material to write an interesting article and to show notability. But for now, this is just a stub with no claim of notability. Edison 21:07, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Sadly delete A church celebrating 150 years of existence should be notable, but the editors of this article failed to show any. WVhybrid 05:23, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep A church of that age, in wisconsin, is notable. I agree that the article is a stub, but the originators (or anyone else) need an opportunity to improve. Seems to be part of a WP:POINT about churches. Pastordavid 16:24, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep per above. WP:CHURCH has no agreed policy. --Docg 14:07, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. No assertion of notability, will reconsider if article is improved. Dr Zak 16:30, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment If you guys are only deleting it because it's a stub, then it's not really your place to be trying to delete the article. Granted, I vote delete since it's not-notable, NOT becuase it's a stub. --Wizardman 18:07, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.