Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Friday Night Raw

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Deletion has the weight of numbers on its side, and those favoring keep assert the importance or notability of thsi event without providing any sources to support that assertion, which significantly weakens their argument. If sources clearly supporting notability were found, this could perhaps be recreated. DES ^(talk) 16:12, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Friday Night Raw

Friday Night Raw (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Non-notable. English Google results: "Friday Night Raw" jerusalem, Hebrew Google results: "רואו ירושלים", "רו ירושלים". nadav (talk) 03:29, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

Delete I couldn't find much to support this event... but note that the WWE has trademarked the name Friday Night Raw [1]Balloonman 03:51, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

• Delete - no assertion of notability, though I suppose they could theoretically have gotten press-coverage for their disruptions... Tewfik^Talk 04:13, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Israel-related deletions. -- Tewfik^Talk 04:13, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - no assertion of notability, reads much as an advert Bigdaddy1981 07:15, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Violates WP:Notability, too similar to World Wrestling Entertainment (WWE). I wish those jews would change their company's name.--Edtropolis 17:50, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
• Keep - significant to Israeli rave scene. known to everyone in Jerusalem. also suggest to delete last vote and\or remark: "I wish those jews would change their company's name." this article is similar to WWE by purpose cause in deals with wwf materials. Marina T. 19:45, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Can you find sources about this organization? Without sources, we can't know if it passes the notability test. nadav (talk) 21:54, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
• Keep Heard about it many times. But it's too long article Shmila 19:59, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
• Delete origional research--sefringle^Talk 03:22, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
• Keep All, this is a real thing - and was quite influential in its time. We've put so much time, sweat and effort into this...--Fuzzyami 05:20, 17 June 2007 (UTC) — Fuzzyami (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
• Keep (Regrettably....)--Mike18xx 03:39, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Can you explain your reasoning for keeping? nadav (talk) 04:13, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Change my vote to Neutral; when I first saw the AfD, I mistook it for RAW.--Mike18xx 05:14, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.