Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frequentis

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. the number of google hits isn't a reason to keep an article and Corpx, out of all people should know thatJaranda ^{wat's sup} 21:01, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Frequentis

Frequentis (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

I'm trying to remember why I tagged this as speedy A7...anyway, thanks to Scientizzle for pointing out the mistake. What bothered me was an apparent COI by the author, who's other article (now deleted, I presume) dealt with a similar topic. Whether that's grounds for deletion, I am no longer certain. Shalom ^Hello 02:34, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. "Wikipedia is not an advertising service." I note that the linked article Hannes Bardach is up for speedy AfD as well.[1] --Malcolmxl5 07:38, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Austria-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 11:27, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
• Weak Keep Yes, it reads like an ad, but they seem pretty notable Corpx 17:23, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
• Weak Keep per Corpx. Oysterguitarist 21:50, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
• Comment possibly notable company (Thanks for the 411, Corpx), but NN principal. Bearian 23:55, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.