Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Freemasons (band)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was keep. Sango123 02:57, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Freemasons (band)
This article is about a nn group. All Music Guide has no relevant entries, Google has only one hit besides this article (freemasons + band), and while they may have released singles, they never charted, and there don't seem to be any media articles on the group either. MSJapan 03:08, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete nn band. Tychocat 05:20, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
- Keep - they have charted [1] in the UK at #11, so qualify under WP:MUSIC Trebor 06:42, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
- Weak keep - The UK Top 40 placement should be enough to give them notability, although this brings up to mind the problem with making articles about dance music projects. With producers creating a variety of aliases for themselves and for collaborations, a lot of different articles about the same team can be created that can be merged. Freemasons could conceivably be merged to Phats & Small, although the absence of Jason Hayward from the Freemasons project should prevent that. The article is also badly named, since the Freemasons, like most house music collective names, are not a real band, but a dance music project/act made up of two producers and fronted by a guest singer. --Pc13 08:37, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
- Keep per Trebor Kevin 10:47, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
- Keep per above. --badlydrawnjeff talk 11:20, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
- Keep per Trebor. CP/M 14:40, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
- Weak keep per above. Xyrael T 19:24, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. Charting band under WP:MUSIC. Capitalistroadster 23:23, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
- Keep, scored at least one massive hit with their remix of Faith Evans' Mesmerized. --mrbartjens 23:22, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.