Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Freedom's Five
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to List of Marvel Comics teams and organizations. --Bongwarrior (talk) 05:03, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Freedom's Five
Non-notable comic book group. They appeared in a flashback in an issue of Invaders in 1976. Outside of this flashback the group has not made any appearances. Stephen Day (talk) 05:05, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
NOTE: Redirecting to List of Marvel Comics teams and organizations seems like a sensible compromise to me. I'd like to withdraw my nomination and close the debate. Stephen Day (talk) 03:33, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
- Delete, appeared in one comic in the 70s. No real world notability or sources, so fails WP:FICT. Lankiveil (complaints | disco) 12:24, 19 January 2008 (UTC).
- Keep, or
Merge and Redirect to either Union Jack (comics) or Phantom Eagle. BOZ (talk) 17:02, 19 January 2008 (UTC)Redirect to List of Marvel Comics teams and organizations. BOZ (talk) 00:51, 25 January 2008 (UTC)- Comment This is where we come to one of the problems with this article's creation. Its not signficant enough for inclusion, but doesn't have a definative enough destination page to be a useful redirect either. If there is a choice between the two, Phantom eagle makes more sense. Due to his lack of appearances its a bigger part of that character's history than Union Jack's. Even with this choice, the redirect is more awkward than helpful though. Stephen Day (talk) 04:43, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
- Comment Redirecting to List of Marvel Comics teams and organizations seems to be exceptable to me. Stephen Day (talk) 02:55, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
- I thought so. :) If you're comfortable with it, you can withdraw the nomination and we can do a redirect, or you can wait to see how the consensus goes. BOZ (talk) 03:19, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
- How do I withdraw a nomination? Stephen Day (talk) 03:26, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
- Not sure - I think you just need to say it somewhere here, as the nominator, and then an admin will close it? Maybe make a note after your opening statement. If it's clear that you intend to redirect and no one's objecting, the AFD close should be uncontroversial. BOZ (talk) 03:28, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
- How do I withdraw a nomination? Stephen Day (talk) 03:26, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
- I thought so. :) If you're comfortable with it, you can withdraw the nomination and we can do a redirect, or you can wait to see how the consensus goes. BOZ (talk) 03:19, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
- Comment Redirecting to List of Marvel Comics teams and organizations seems to be exceptable to me. Stephen Day (talk) 02:55, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
- Comment This is where we come to one of the problems with this article's creation. Its not signficant enough for inclusion, but doesn't have a definative enough destination page to be a useful redirect either. If there is a choice between the two, Phantom eagle makes more sense. Due to his lack of appearances its a bigger part of that character's history than Union Jack's. Even with this choice, the redirect is more awkward than helpful though. Stephen Day (talk) 04:43, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. Notability for this fictional entity hasn't been established. Only one reference, and it's a primary source. Since it fails WP:FICT, it should go. -- Mikeblas (talk) 21:16, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. -- Hiding T 21:28, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
- Redirect per above; not enough notability to establish worth as own article. Master of Puppets Call me MoP!☺ 02:50, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
- Delete or redirect Per above. Earthbendingmaster 03:04, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
