Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Freeband Business Blueprint

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE. Jinian 21:57, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Freeband Business Blueprint

• del. Original research in its purest form, despite a couple of references. Also, the article did not show any success of the approach, rare google hits for the term, hence notability objection as well. Mikkalai 22:59, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. The article is a description of a process from a student so it doesn't seem to be vanity publishing. The original author has provided references, so I don't see what the problem is. See here for some academic papers on it. the article could do with some context, because the methodology seems to be specific to Holland; but thats a quibble not a serious criticism. :ChrisG 20:34, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • We are speaking of a particular term, "Freeband Business Blueprint". I don't see its blueprint presented prominently. Encyclopedia is not in business explaining someone else's business practices. It is student's essay, original research, base on data from the Telematica institit, i.e., on primary sources. Encyclopedia must be based on secondary sources, in order to ensure peer review. Wikipedia is not in busines of verifying claims of Telematica Institut about its products. Mikkalai 20:58, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as copy/paste from business model. Likely copyvio. Radiant_* 09:54, Apr 11, 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.