Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Freeadom in the Country

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. – ABCD 00:15, 2 May 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Freeadom in the Country

• Article was created by a new guy who doesn't realize the way Wikipedia articles are meant to work -- he created it to be a clickable "legend" that'd be used in several articles where he'd use the Freedom House ratings. When I was adding the vfd notice, I advised in the edit summary that he should simply explain where the ratings come from within the article, and link to the Freedom House page instead. As for Freeadom in the Country, please delete. Even spelled correctly the title's meaningless. Aris Katsaris 00:29, Apr 26, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete --Fuzzball! (talk) 02:21, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, I agree with Aris Katsaris. Also isn't "freedom" a subjective concept? — JIP | Talk 06:16, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete for poor title alone, before even looking at the content. Agree with Aris Katsaris. — Stevie is the man! ^{Talk | Work} 14:08, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Comment - this is a neat idea. Looks like he was looking for a sort of template. The "modular section" concept is good. It's not an "article", but it's not supposed to be.
• Delete as nonencyclopedic, original research, and Wikipedia is not a soapbox. Wikipedia is not a travel guide may also apply.  ; ) Postdlf 08:57, 1 May 2005 (UTC)

• Delete - misleading.--Prem Vilas Fortran Rara 17:08, May 1, 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.