Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Free Press

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was KEEP. dbenbenn | talk 09:40, 23 Jan 2005 (UTC)

The votes were 4 keep, 1 merge, 1 delete.

[edit] Free Press

Seems like an advert to me. --Ryan B. (Talk, contributions) 22:04, 17 Jan 2005 (UTC)

• Marginal keep. There's not enough here to make a determination one way or the other. I say keep as long as someone expands this beyond sub-stub status and establishes notoriety. 23skidoo 22:47, 17 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, not notable, possible advertisement. Megan1967 00:50, 18 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Keep Robert McChesney, founder of this org, scores 127,000 Google hits as an exact phrase. It would seem that this is notable, though it certainly needs expansion. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 00:55, Jan 18, 2005 (UTC)
• Merge into Robert McChesney. It is (as yet) only notable in that he founded it. GeorgeStepanek\^talk 01:31, 18 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Keep I've expanded this entry a little, agree it needs more. It's distinct from Robery McChesney in that it's a multi-issue organization whereas McChesney is an author and academic. Ekai 02:15, 18 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Keep - we shouldn't drop the information about this "Free Press". If nothing else, it will be useful for the eventual disambiguation Free Press will merit (there's a book publishing house Free Press, and scads of newspapers). Samaritan 09:51, 18 Jan 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.