Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frederick Roe

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. - Bobet 22:40, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Frederick Roe

No sources. Delete Likely vanity. Included with several other articles relating to "Roe Family" and "Modern Kings of Munster". Guliolopez 10:55, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

• Delete - Vanity article --Ryano 11:10, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - not so much vanity as crackpot. BrendanH 11:36, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as above. ant_ie 12:29, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, vanity. --Terence Ong 13:58, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete the lot of 'em! Snalwibma 16:32, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Unverifiable vanity, WP:VANITY refers.  (aeropagitica)  16:37, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Not-notable or non-sense. Djegan 19:29, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Delete. NN. Vanity --† Ðy§ep§ion † ^{Speak your mind} 00:07, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Unverifiable, vanity. Bastun 13:03, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Vanity, flat wrong too. Angus McLellan 15:32, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
• DeleteMore MacCarthney Mor seafoid. Fergananim 18:35, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.