Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frederick George Lindley Wood

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 30 June 2005 08:40 (UTC)

[edit] Frederick George Lindley Wood

There is no assertion as to why this person is notable, and I was unable to find any on a google search. I did find this [1], which appears to be the source of the information. Leithp 17:10, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)

  • Weak Keep. His nobility makes him somewhat notable. Matjlav 18:38, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Keep. His father seemed to have been quite notable in politics, and that makes him worth a page, too. Matjlav 18:40, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, notability is not by default inheritable. If his father is notable, make him a footnote in that article. Radiant_>|< 19:14, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, being the child of a notable person does not make one notable. RickK 20:53, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. This is not a geneaology website. Article does not even attempt to establish notability. Gamaliel 20:54, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Birthdate + deathdate + parents + spouse + children. A classic Wikitree entry. Get thee to Wikitree! Wikipedia is not a genealogy database, and notability is not inheritable. Delete. Uncle G 21:05, 2005 Jun 18 (UTC)
  • Keep. On a side note, I finally get to incorporate the Duke of Kintyre and Lorne as being mildly relevant to this! Yay! – ugen64 01:27, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)
    • That rationale makes no sense. How is Duke of Kintyre and Lorne relevant here? It seems entirely unrelated to this article's subject. Uncle G 10:49, 2005 Jun 19 (UTC)
      • He died when he was less than a year old. Obviously not notable. The only reason he has an article is because of who his parents are. – ugen64 04:17, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. What Gamaliel (talk · contribs) said. Pburka 03:53, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete non notable, agree with Rick. JamesBurns 04:30, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be placed on a related article talk page, if one exists; in an undeletion request, if it does not; or below this section.